Mauritius

18 Oct to 24 Oct: 40 in every 100 of its stories were about people being harmed — about twice the world's share (19).

What stood out The news pointed at Mauritius on 1 of the 7 days held. Most on Monday 19 October 2026: 8 of its 15 stories (53%) were about people being harmed, usually 17%.
Compared with the world's news over the same days; "usual" is its own 30 days before.
The evidence its 12 stories about people being harmed in these days → few stories
Harm in the newsHelp & hopeParts of lifeHarm reportedFeelingsTone of words

Mauritius: stories about people being harmed, out of every 100 of its stories

Dashed line: the world. Shaded: its normal range over these days. Blue dots: its biggest days.

75%0%18 Oct19 Oct20 Oct21 Oct22 Oct23 Oct24 Oct18 Oct: 0%; world 20%19 Oct: 53%; world 19% · rights and justice Mauritius20 Oct: 0%; world 18%21 Oct: 33%; world 18%22 Oct: 75%; world 19%23 Oct: 0%; world 19%
MauritiusThe world

Key events

the events its news covered most, newest on the right

No events in these days.

Its biggest days

when the news pointed at Mauritius most
Monday 19 October 2026 · Rights & justice

8 of its 15 stories (53%) were about people being harmed, usually 17%.

In detail

against the world's news, same days

Parts of life

Share of its stories about people being harmed, by part of life.

Rights & justice58%7 stories
Conflict & violence8%1 story
Deaths & injuries, cause not given8%1 story
Health8%1 story
Food & livelihood8%1 story
Shelter & services8%1 story

Harm reported

Stories, not people: a story counts once however many people it reports.

Stories reporting arrests4 Stories reporting people injured2 Stories reporting people killed1 Stories reporting people affected1

Harsh or warm words

harshwarm

Its stories' words were about as the world's.

Filled dot: Mauritius. Ring: the world. Measured over 12 stories.

Feelings

Too few stories to read its feelings.

Where it happened

Mauritius (bright) and its neighbours. Dots: its key events in these days. Click a dot for its stories.

How to read these numbers →