We measure how the world's news covered people being harmed — and the help and hope within it.
169 of its 186 stories (91%) were about people being harmed, usually 66%. Dinka accounted for 111 of South Sudan's 169 stories about harm, carried by 114 outlets. 104 of Dinka's 111 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of arrests ran at more than ten times the usual rate (113 stories). Hunger was named in 113 of its stories about harm, about 8 times usual, with malaria.
90 of its 308 stories (29%) were about people being harmed, usually 19%. Reports of people affected ran at about 7 times the usual rate (44 stories). Heavy rain was named in 43 of its stories about harm, more than ten times usual. Its coverage was about twice as grief-stricken as the world's. Anger in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
273 of its 453 stories (60%) were about people being harmed, usually 52%. Cairo accounted for 249 of Egypt's 273 stories about harm, carried by 200 outlets. Reports of people injured ran at about twice the usual rate (144 stories). Its coverage was about twice as angry as the world's. Fear in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
124 of its 133 stories (93%) were about people being harmed, usually 23%. Montevideo accounted for 116 of Uruguay's 124 stories about harm, carried by 94 outlets. Reports of arrests ran at about 8 times the usual rate (106 stories).
246 of its 433 stories (57%) were about people being harmed, usually 21%. Amsterdam accounted for 226 of the Netherlands' 246 stories about harm, carried by 354 outlets. Reports of arrests ran at more than ten times the usual rate (179 stories).
233 of its 374 stories (62%) were about people being harmed, usually 31%. 112 of Bolivar's 131 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of people injured ran at more than ten times the usual rate (30 stories).
51 of its 97 stories (53%) were about people being harmed, usually 17%. Reports of people affected ran at more than ten times the usual rate (42 stories). Fear in its coverage rose to about twice its own usual.
74 of its 88 stories (84%) were about people being harmed, usually 55%. Reports of people injured ran at about 5 times the usual rate (14 stories). Its coverage was about three times as angry as the world's.
70 of its 163 stories (43%) were about people being harmed, usually 23%. Reports of evacuations ran at more than ten times the usual rate (15 stories). Heavy rain was named in 25 of its stories about harm, about three times usual.
416 of its 717 stories (58%) were about people being harmed, usually 42%. Reports of people injured ran at about 5 times the usual rate (84 stories). Its coverage was about twice as grief-stricken as the world's.
Also named far more than usual: tsunami in Papua New Guinea (499 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); plane crash in China (199 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); heavy rain in Fiji (25 of its stories, about three times its usual); volcanic eruption in Solomon Islands (13 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); outbreaks in Tanzania (13 of its stories, about 8 times its usual).
Stories about people being harmed, in every 100 stories, the 30 days to 17 Dec. The big dot is this day; the shaded band is a normal day (the 30 days before it). Click a day to open it. Based on 34,896 stories about harm among 151,292 counted on 17 Dec.
No day had a higher share of stories about people being harmed since 13 November 2016. Reports of evacuations ran at about twice the usual rate, most often about Syria and the US. Mentions of the tsunami ran more than ten times their usual in Papua New Guinea's news. of the day's 151,292 news stories, 23 in every 100 were about people being harmed, above the usual 21.
Written by code from the day's numbers.
Countries with at least 50 stories that day.
Stories, not people.
The day's biggest events: attacks, accidents and disasters, people displaced, protests, outbreaks. Bigger dot: more stories. Ranked by the share of the day's outlets that reported it and how clearly it was about one thing, the same way for every place and year; the news data does not say who attacked whom, so both sides of a war appear where the news put them. Click a dot for its stories.
Of the stories about people being harmed, what part of life each was about. The mark is usual.
Stories that report it, not people: we count what reporters wrote, not what happened.
The words in the day's stories were much harsher than usual. Filled dot: today. Ring: usual.
From the words reporters used across the whole day, never one story. Fear is the weakest of the four measures. How?
Unlock a year of trends, free. Follow up to 5 countries, with a bell when their news changes, and 👍 vote for Pro — ten years of the archive, any period, daily alerts.
Create a free accountSign in · a username, an email and a password.