We measure how the world's news covered people being harmed — and the help and hope within it.
276 of its 301 stories (92%) were about people being harmed, usually 40%. Kigali accounted for 193 of Rwanda's 276 stories about harm, carried by 264 outlets. Reports of arrests ran at more than ten times the usual rate (197 stories). Fear in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
115 of its 192 stories (60%) were about people being harmed, usually 19%. Vienna accounted for 109 of Austria's 115 stories about harm, carried by 173 outlets. Reports of people injured ran at more than ten times the usual rate (89 stories). Its coverage was about one and a half times as fearful as the world's.
218 of its 388 stories (56%) were about people being harmed, usually 25%. Bern accounted for 192 of Switzerland's 218 stories about harm, carried by 361 outlets. Reports of evacuations ran at about 9 times the usual rate (13 stories). Poisoning was named in 19 of its stories about harm, about 4 times usual.
217 of its 419 stories (52%) were about people being harmed, usually 30%. 149 of Istanbul's 151 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of people injured ran at about 5 times the usual rate (27 stories). Its coverage was about one and a half times as warm as the world's.
101 of its 106 stories (95%) were about people being harmed, usually 61%. Kompienga accounted for 90 of Burkina Faso's 101 stories about harm, carried by 108 outlets. Reports of people injured ran at about three times the usual rate (23 stories). Its coverage was about three times as angry as the world's.
748 of its 1,156 stories (65%) were about people being harmed, usually 45%. 215 of Jerusalem's 384 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of people displaced ran at about 5 times the usual rate (75 stories). Poisoning was named in 83 of its stories about harm, more than ten times usual.
1,597 of its 1,932 stories (83%) were about people being harmed, usually 34%. Reports of evacuations ran at more than ten times the usual rate (259 stories). Storm surge was named in 632 of its stories about harm, about 5 times usual, with cyclone and volcanic eruption.
250 of its 285 stories (88%) were about people being harmed, usually 41%. Addis Ababa accounted for 199 of Ethiopia's 250 stories about harm, carried by 152 outlets. Its coverage was about one and a half times as fearful as the world's.
349 of its 757 stories (46%) were about people being harmed, usually 20%. Reports of people injured ran at more than ten times the usual rate (211 stories). Anger in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
67 of its 75 stories (89%) were about people being harmed, usually 49%. Nouakchott accounted for 60 of Mauritania's 67 stories about harm, carried by 68 outlets. Its coverage was about three times as warm as the world's.
Also named far more than usual: cholera in Zimbabwe (91 of its stories, about three times its usual); storm surge in Philippines (632 of its stories, about 5 times its usual); wildfires in Puerto Rico (56 of its stories, about 6 times its usual); storm surge in China (104 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); malaria in Indonesia (31 of its stories, more than ten times its usual).
Stories about people being harmed, in every 100 stories, the 30 days to 15 Sep. The big dot is this day; the shaded band is a normal day (the 30 days before it). Click a day to open it. Based on 30,507 stories about harm among 114,278 counted on 15 Sep.
The share of stories about people being harmed was the highest since 1 January 2018. 27 in every 100 of the day's 114,278 news stories were about people being harmed, above the usual 21. Reports of evacuations ran at about 4 times the usual rate, most often about the US and the Philippines. Reports of volunteers, a sign of help, ran at about three times the usual rate.
Written by code from the day's numbers.
Countries with at least 50 stories that day.
Stories, not people.
The day's biggest events: attacks, accidents and disasters, people displaced, protests, outbreaks. Bigger dot: more stories. Ranked by the share of the day's outlets that reported it and how clearly it was about one thing, the same way for every place and year; the news data does not say who attacked whom, so both sides of a war appear where the news put them. Click a dot for its stories.
Of the stories about people being harmed, what part of life each was about. The mark is usual.
Stories that report it, not people: we count what reporters wrote, not what happened.
The words in the day's stories were harsher than usual. Filled dot: today. Ring: usual.
From the words reporters used across the whole day, never one story. Fear is the weakest of the four measures. How?
Unlock a year of trends, free. Follow up to 5 countries, with a bell when their news changes, and 👍 vote for Pro — ten years of the archive, any period, daily alerts.
Create a free accountSign in · a username, an email and a password.