We measure how the world's news covered people being harmed — and the help and hope within it.
131 of its 158 stories (83%) were about people being harmed, usually 76%. Sanaa accounted for 88 of Yemen's 131 stories about harm, carried by 78 outlets. 68 of Sanaa's 88 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of people displaced ran at about three times the usual rate (18 stories). Its coverage was about twice as angry as the world's.
457 of its 1,054 stories (43%) were about people being harmed, usually 21%. Reports of people killed ran at about 9 times the usual rate (267 stories). Hunger was named in 207 of its stories about harm, more than ten times usual. Its coverage was about twice as grief-stricken as the world's.
87 of its 137 stories (64%) were about people being harmed, usually 49%. Baghdad accounted for 60 of Iraq's 87 stories about harm, carried by 145 outlets. Reports of people injured ran at about 4 times the usual rate (40 stories). Its coverage was about one and a half times as grief-stricken as the world's.
119 of its 313 stories (38%) were about people being harmed, usually 24%. Reports of evacuations ran at about 8 times the usual rate (87 stories). Drownings were named in 33 of its stories about harm, about 4 times usual.
228 of its 567 stories (40%) were about people being harmed, usually 26%. 123 of Harare's 153 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of abductions ran at more than ten times the usual rate (97 stories). Its coverage was about twice as angry as the world's.
100 of its 190 stories (53%) were about people being harmed, usually 40%. 21 of Kampala's 39 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of refugees ran at about twice the usual rate (10 stories). HIV was named in 35 of its stories about harm, about 5 times usual.
89 of Hong Kong's 93 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of people affected ran at about 4 times the usual rate (79 stories). Tsunami was named in 12 of its stories about harm, about 5 times usual. Its coverage was about twice as angry as the world's. Fear in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
693 of its 1,990 stories (35%) were about people being harmed, usually 28%. Reports of people injured ran at about 4 times the usual rate (296 stories). Extreme cold was named in 24 of its stories about harm, more than ten times usual.
13 of its 26 stories (50%) were about people being harmed, usually 32%. 4 of Port-au-Prince's 4 stories were about protests or strikes. Reports of arrests ran at about 4 times the usual rate (7 stories).
Reports of evacuations ran at about 8 times the usual rate (10 stories). Drought was named in 22 of its stories about harm, about 4 times usual. Its coverage was about one and a half times as fearful as the world's.
Also named far more than usual: typhoon in Japan (132 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); hiv in Uganda (35 of its stories, about 5 times its usual); ebola in Burundi (11 of its stories, about three times its usual); hiv in Mali (13 of its stories, about 10 times its usual); natural hazards in Iceland (10 of its stories, about 4 times its usual).
Stories about people being harmed, in every 100 stories, the 30 days to 15 Aug. The big dot is this day; the shaded band is a normal day (the 30 days before it). Click a day to open it. Based on 35,002 stories about harm among 163,443 counted on 15 Aug.
Mentions of the hunger ran more than ten times their usual in Malaysia's news. of the day's 163,443 news stories, 21 in every 100 were about people being harmed, as usual. Reports of evacuations ran at about three times the usual rate, most often about the US and Greece. Yemen's news was 83% about people being harmed, against a usual 76%. A year earlier, on 15 August 2018, 21 in every 100 stories were about people being harmed, the same as today.
Written by code from the day's numbers.
Countries with at least 50 stories that day.
Stories, not people.
The day's biggest events: attacks, accidents and disasters, people displaced, protests, outbreaks. Bigger dot: more stories. Ranked by the share of the day's outlets that reported it and how clearly it was about one thing, the same way for every place and year; the news data does not say who attacked whom, so both sides of a war appear where the news put them. Click a dot for its stories.
Of the stories about people being harmed, what part of life each was about. The mark is usual.
Stories that report it, not people: we count what reporters wrote, not what happened.
The words in the day's stories were much softer than usual. Filled dot: today. Ring: usual.
From the words reporters used across the whole day, never one story. Fear is the weakest of the four measures. How?
Unlock a year of trends, free. Follow up to 5 countries, with a bell when their news changes, and 👍 vote for Pro — ten years of the archive, any period, daily alerts.
Create a free accountSign in · a username, an email and a password.