We measure how the world's news covered people being harmed — and the help and hope within it.
140 of its 244 stories (57%) were about people being harmed, usually 33%. Masaka accounted for 104 of Uganda's 140 stories about harm, carried by 80 outlets. Reports of people displaced ran at more than ten times the usual rate (102 stories). Hunger was named in 49 of its stories about harm, about 6 times usual.
149 of its 354 stories (42%) were about people being harmed, usually 22%. Reports of evacuations ran at about 5 times the usual rate (34 stories). Natural hazards were named in 40 of its stories about harm, about 6 times usual. Fear in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
170 of its 179 stories (95%) were about people being harmed, usually 72%. Bujumbura accounted for 125 of Burundi's 170 stories about harm, carried by 105 outlets. Reports of arrests ran at more than ten times the usual rate (127 stories). Its coverage was about three times as grief-stricken as the world's.
131 of its 137 stories (96%) were about people being harmed, usually 77%. Bambari accounted for 82 of the Central African Republic's 131 stories about harm, carried by 85 outlets. Reports of refugees ran at about 6 times the usual rate (92 stories). Its coverage was about twice as warm as the world's.
98 of its 101 stories (97%) were about people being harmed, usually 48%. Reports of people injured ran at more than ten times the usual rate (84 stories). Its coverage was about twice as grief-stricken as the world's. Warmth in its coverage rose to about one and a half times its own usual.
77 of its 115 stories (67%) were about people being harmed, usually 27%. Reports of arrests ran at about 8 times the usual rate (59 stories). HIV was named in 56 of its stories about harm, more than ten times usual.
339 of its 719 stories (47%) were about people being harmed, usually 23%. Reports of arrests ran at about 6 times the usual rate (224 stories). Landslides were named in 10 of its stories about harm, about 9 times usual.
2,945 of its 7,104 stories (41%) were about people being harmed, usually 20%. Reports of people injured ran at more than ten times the usual rate (1,785 stories). Its coverage was about twice as fearful as the world's. Anger in its coverage rose to about twice its own usual.
364 of its 1,149 stories (32%) were about people being harmed, usually 16%. Reports of arrests ran at more than ten times the usual rate (270 stories). Its coverage was about one and a half times as angry as the world's.
65 of its 96 stories (68%) were about people being harmed, usually 48%. Maseru accounted for 62 of Lesotho's 65 stories about harm, carried by 54 outlets. Its coverage was about one and a half times as warm as the world's.
Also named far more than usual: hiv in Tanzania (56 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); storms in Bermuda (20 of its stories, about three times its usual); earthquake in Nepal (23 of its stories, about three times its usual); measles in Bangladesh (81 of its stories, more than ten times its usual); landslides in Thailand (13 of its stories, more than ten times its usual).
Stories about people being harmed, in every 100 stories, the 30 days to 16 Sep. The big dot is this day; the shaded band is a normal day (the 30 days before it). Click a day to open it. Based on 30,900 stories about harm among 112,717 counted on 16 Sep.
On the side of help, reports of peace efforts ran at about one and a half times the usual rate. Stories about people being harmed made up 27 in every 100 of the day's 112,717 stories, above the usual 26. Reports of refugees ran at about twice the usual rate, most often about Bangladesh and Iraq. In Tanzania's news, mentions of HIV ran more than ten times their usual. A year earlier, on 16 September 2016, 20 in every 100 stories were about people being harmed, against 27 today.
Written by code from the day's numbers.
Countries with at least 50 stories that day.
Stories, not people.
The day's biggest events: attacks, accidents and disasters, people displaced, protests, outbreaks. Bigger dot: more stories. Ranked by the share of the day's outlets that reported it and how clearly it was about one thing, the same way for every place and year; the news data does not say who attacked whom, so both sides of a war appear where the news put them. Click a dot for its stories.
Of the stories about people being harmed, what part of life each was about. The mark is usual.
Stories that report it, not people: we count what reporters wrote, not what happened.
The words in the day's stories were harsher than usual. Filled dot: today. Ring: usual.
From the words reporters used across the whole day, never one story. Fear is the weakest of the four measures. How?
Unlock a year of trends, free. Follow up to 5 countries, with a bell when their news changes, and 👍 vote for Pro — ten years of the archive, any period, daily alerts.
Create a free accountSign in · a username, an email and a password.